Bauxite is the source of aluminum and a crucial element in industrialization, not least of all in its war-making moment. As a result, he argues, different forms of anti-democratization can arise through anti-democratic one-party dictatorships, military juntas, or theocratic fundamentalism. For example for me, the only reason I have been increasingly more environmentally conscious is due to the advertising by companies that purport to be environmentally friendly. There is hardly a single international institution that has not been questioned, undermined, or outright abandoned by the United States in the name of its need to protect its sovereign interests. Although I myself tend to be an ardent proponent of free-market globalization, he does bring up interesting points in that the media industrial complex sole purpose is to grow and make profits to that end it does not look toward “good cultural values” that most Americans profess to.
Had I heeded these friendly critics more consistently, I would have certainly written a better book. The American textile company that moves its factory to Indonesia and, using cheaper labor, sends cheaper dresses back across the border incurs no trade de cit, only greater pro tability. For nations, however, no island is ever really an island. Technology also holds out the promise of a new age alchemy: Barber’s best point is that the unrestrained capitalism of neoliberal globalization has wrought havoc on the lives and values of many people, especially in the Third World, and that structures of control similar to those existing at the national level must be extended to the global level if globalization is to live up to its promise of more peace and prosperity. In order to combat the profit-driven McWorld running over weak democratic governments and sectarian Jihad, he advocates using a global network of engaged citizens via the internet to monitor the worst abuses of McWorld and Jihad.
Jihad vs. McWorld: Terrorism’s Challenge to Democracy
Although I mcword not heavily pro-environment, I do see the need for clean-energy industry movement to grow because since America is the predominant consumer of energy and given all forms of energy is limited then it makes sense to have technology that will harness renewable energy and thus grow a new industry. Yet Jihad and McWorld have this in common: A little too dramatic and pessimistic for my taste Civic life and personal relationships are to be held above all else.
hhesis But we have not even begun to globalize democracy, which—precisely because it is political and is de ned by sovereignty—is trapped inside the nation-state box. The only way to turn Muslim countries into stable liberal democracy is to actively favor moderate forms of Islam like Sufism while at the same time forcing autocratic rulers in the country to liberalize their economy to foster a growing middle class so when the wave democracy eventually takes route in those countries then they are less likely to decouple themselves from the global economy.
Jihad vs. McWorld: Terrorism’s Challenge to Democracy – PDF Free Download
Made in one or more statemeng the following countries: Moreover, as the developable non-Terminal Third World evinces a growing First World appetite for consumption to fuel its developing industrialization, global consumption is clearly going to outstrip global production by ever greater margins, increasing the urgency of resource dependency and bringing Malthusian imperatives into dramatic play once again: Barber is no radical, but then radical reform would require crises mobilizing coherent and enduring movements, something like the socialist movement of the last century and a half, and that itself is an uncertain proposition.
Neither Jihad nor McWorld aspires to resecure the civic virtues undermined by its denationalizing practices; neither global markets nor blood communities service public goods or pursue equality and justice.
Although externally antithetical both ideologies share in it a propensity for operating outside the nation-state democratic institutions and thus can be seen as anarchic.
McWorld has created bridges between cultures in the interest of profit.
This is a thouroughly engaging exegesis of the conflict between ethnic tribal nationalism and globalization. As statemet the decoupling of the American consumer from oil and our relationship to oil companies.
Markets and globalized nancial institutions, whether multinational corporations or individual currency speculators, are deeply averse to oversight by nation-states. As much as he rants against capitalism, his book with the provocative title, enhanced by the clearly Muslim woman on the cover, was all for the profits and money.
With the emergence of our markets, we have come up with international laws and treaties in order to maintain stability and efficiency in the interconnected economy. I n Jihad vs. Both men seem to feel that the massive social changes wrought by the economic shift to digitization is correctable through state policy.
Jihad vs. McWorld
American manufacturing leadership simply is not any longer American, anymore than Japanese manufacturing leadership is Japanese. We used to get 8, pieces of equipment—conveyor belts, lumber—from Russia a month. While I can see this in 3rd world countries in which multi-nationals can dictate the terms into which they enter the market, I do not see this a problem in 1st world countries in which there are strong governmental mechanisms regulates government worst abuses.
This book is not for everybody that’s for sure, as I myself fought the urge to drop it half way done a couple of times, if it weren’t for its highly sophisticated and elaborated discussion points, amazing wording and lexicological allure.
Chinese entrepreneurs vie for the attention of party cadres in Beijing and simultaneously pursue KFC franchises in cities like in Beijing and simultaneously pursue KFC franchises in cities like Nanjing, Hangzhou, and Xian where twenty-eight outlets serve overcustomers a day. Where defense and aerospace industry were closely associated with hard power and state command structures, the new consumer economies privileged the private sector and pointed toward soft power.
What ends as Jihad may begin as a simple search for a local identity, some set of common personal attributes to hold out against the numbing and neutering uniformities of industrial modernization and the colonizing culture of McWorld.
In almost any soft consumer-sector one looks at, the pitch is at once ever more American and ever more global: These are final numbers for world oil production for I can accept that there are some similarities between some of these cultural aspects, and their effect on the nation-state can be similar to that of “McWorld”, but the author takes the point too far.
Analysis of Jihad vs. McWorld Article Written by Benjamin Barber Book Report/Review
McWorld is accompanied by this ideology of privatization—what Europeans often call neoliberalism and George Soros has labeled market fundamentalism an appropriate implicit comparison to Jihadic fundamentalism —that kihad democracy by attacking government and its culture of public power.
It is not terrorism itself but this facilitating environment against which the second-front battle is directed. Nov 10, Amanda rated it liked it Recommended to Amanda by: We know that the planet can be asphyxiated statemfnt greenhouse gases because Brazilian farmers want mcworpd be part of jihxd twentieth century and are burning down their tropical rain forests to clear a little land to plow, and because many Indonesians make a living out of converting their because many Indonesians make a living out of converting their lush jungles into toothpicks for fastidious Japanese diners, upsetting the delicate oxygen balance and puncturing our global lungs.
An enlightening view of how the world is moving toward Globalization and how this new paradigm needs to change. It is now apparent, as we mount a new military o ense against Jihad understood not as Islam but as militant fundamentalism that democracy rather than terrorism may become the principal victim of the battle currently being waged.
The Chinese have recently committed to automobile manufacture as a foundation for economic modernization: While the United States and the Soviet Union focused their energies on defense-and aerospace-related statemejt industry, Germany and Japan homed in on consumer products where, ironically, the ideal American mobile, autonomous, choosing consumer who would de ne the future economy was the choosing consumer who would de ne the future economy was the natural target.